Andrew Barnert via Python-ideas writes:
> But I don’t see why that rules out the “bare colon” form that I and
> someone else apparently both proposed in separate sub threads of
> this thread:
>
> { :a, "b": x, :c }
This sort of reminds me of the "leading colon" convention for keywords
in Lisp, where a keyword is *defined* to be a symbol whose value is
itself.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/VPFMHYKE2GVDFCFYQWBMDCXKPYY4H7UU/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
