> I'm torn -- on the one hand, these very old modules may as well stay frozen in time (please double check that they aren't listed in PEP 594)
And > I expect that will be quite common — older code commonly uses lower case class names Thank, checking 594 is a good idea; I understand why you are thorn, and I can see how such a change can be seen as noise. But I believe that consistency will be a win in the long run. It make complete sens to decide whether and how to rename on a per-module basis. But for each module the discussion should likely be on b.p.o. My original request on bpo[1] was for `re` which is actively maintained, but I was advised to ask for a more general policy and thoughts here as whether renaming of a an exception was acceptable. -- Matthias 1: https://bugs.python.org/issue38981 _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/P2P4SNGBEL7NGDC64SURYGP3AGS7IDFC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
