On 07/29/2019 06:35 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
3. syntax that solves a problem, but may mislead people to think
it solves a different problem until they learn better;
3.1 syntax that solves a problem, but is misleading to many who are
still confused after they "have learnt better"
I feel your pain: I don't understand async code when I see it either.
Neither do I, but I have no need to. I do have a need to use for...else, and every time
I do I have to think through the "this is a search loop" to get the right
semantics (sorry for bringing that up again, but it's a great example).
If this "with...except" leads to more robust code then I think many would like
to use it, but not if it's confusing as that would lead to less robust code.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/6GXB4NWIQM4Q27JOIGKJT3GQUWFO72XO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
