On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 3:48 PM Rhodri James <[email protected]> wrote: > It really doesn't. If the end user is going to implement the logic of > this anyway, implementing signal linkage as a method call or class all > of its own is not a significant extra burden.
There are very constructive discussions in terms how this could be handled and which turns out not really elegant. Your justification could be used to reject features like descriptors, decorators, meta classes, and you can use that reasoning even just to say "let's all go java". This is not the pythonic for me at all. the burden, is not only on the savings of a few chars, it is on how easy/difficult it can be interpreted and understood. > I'm pretty much done with this conversation too. You have repeatedly > been asked what problem you are trying to solve and repeatedly respond > by restating your solution, which appears to be to impose HDL sematics > onto a non-HDL language. That's never going to be a good idea. Please let's be constructive and be specific, this kind of conclusion without any reasoning behind it not only makes it weak, this is not the healthy type of discussion at all. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
