On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 01:36:28AM -0700, Elias Tarhini <[email protected]>
wrote:
> If I may propose `break n` as a replacement for the original message's
> `break break ... break`, where n>0 is the number of contiguous loops to
> break out of and `break 1` is synonymous with `break`. Seems easier on my
> eyes/noggin than counting out the individual `break` statements.
This is very much error-prone because on any refactoring (increasing
or decreasing the number of loop levels) one must increase/decrease all
numbers in internal loops.
Labels are at least stable.
> Eli
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytman https://phdru.name/ [email protected]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
