On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote:
> The comprehension version isn't awful:
>
> [(a*2).name.upper() for a in seq]
>
> but not all vectorized operations can be written as a chain of calls on
> a single sequence.
>
If they are strictly parallel (no dot products) and you know when writing
the code which variables hold vectors, then (denoting the vector variables
by v1, ..., vn) you can always write
[(expr with x1, ..., xn substituted for v1, ..., vn)
for x1, ..., xn in zip(v1, ..., vn)]
which seems not much worse than the auto-vectorized version (with or
without special syntax).
Haskell (GHC) has parallel list comprehension syntax (
https://downloads.haskell.org/~ghc/latest/docs/html/users_guide/glasgow_exts.html#parallel-list-comprehensions)
so you don't have to explicitly call zip. I wouldn't mind having that in
Python but I don't know what the syntax would be.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
