On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 2:14 AM Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote:
> That might work for Marko's use-case, but the problem is more general
> and I'd like to consider the broader picture. Currently instance __doc__
> attributes are sometimes ignored by help(). Given these:
>
> py> class X:
> ... pass
> ...
> py> a = X()
> py> b = X()
> py> a.__doc__ = "Hello"
> py> b.__doc__ = "Goodbye"
>
> I would expect to see the per-instance docstrings, but in 3.6 at least,
> help(a) and help(b) both give the unhelpful:
>
>
> Help on X in module __main__ object:
Each of them is actually giving help(X). So having that respect *any*
per-instance information first means changing it so help(inst) is
different from help(cls).
> As per my earlier post, making the docstrings a property fails from
> help(). So I think there's some improvement here:
>
> - fix help() so it picks up per-instance docstrings, not just the
> class docstring;
>
> - including the case where the docstring is a property.
Which are really the same thing - having help() care about the actual
instance, not the type.
Currently, it works if you put a property on the metaclass:
>>> class mX(type):
... @property
... def __doc__(self):
... return "Docstring"
...
>>> class X(metaclass=mX): pass
...
>>> help(X())
class X(builtins.object)
| Docstring
| ...
Maybe what we really need here is a convenient way to create class properties.
class X:
@classproperty
def __doc__(cls):
return "Docstring"
I know this has been discussed before, though I can't find a
discussion thread right now.
ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
