> On 23 Sep 2018, at 11:33, Hugh Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could it be that Python has better libraries, is faster to develop for, > attracts > more programmers? If so, I suggest it's worth considering that this might > be *because* Python doesn't have DbC.
I'm not sure how you get from the lack of DbC being a feature to python's success. I use DbC in my python code via the asserts and its been very useful in my experience. If there was a nice way to get better then the assert method I'd use it. Like Angus's PoC. I assume that developers that are not interesting in DbC would simply not use any library/syntax that supported it. Barry
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
