But to the OP, this is not considered a bug. On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 07:59 Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> wrote:
> 21.04.18 17:47, Chris Angelico пише: > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 10:29 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> 21.04.18 13:42, Chris Angelico пише: > >>> > >>> What you're seeing there is actually the peephole optimizer at work. > >> > >> > >> Since 3.7 constant folding is the AST optimizer work. The end result is > the > >> same in most cases though. > >> > >> Other optimization takes place here too. Constants strings that look > like > >> identifiers (short string consisting of ASCII alphanumerical > characters) are > >> interned in the code object constructor. > > > > Ah, sorry, my bad. Anyhow, it's part of compile-time optimization, > > which means that it runs the exact same code for both assignments. > > Don't blame yourself for missing details of the implementation of the > version that is not released yet. ;-) > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
