On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Chris Barker <[email protected]> wrote:
> anyway, that's enough ranting..... > Got carried away with the ranting, and didn't flesh out my point. My point is that unittest is a very static, not very pythonic framework -- if you are productive with it, great, but I don't think it's worth trying to add more pythonic niceties to. Chances are pytest (Or nose2?) may already have them, or, if not, the simpler structure of pytest tests make them easier to write yourself. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
