I find it frustrating that they always return booleans. It would be more useful if any() returned the first true value it finds. This seems like a backward-compatible-enough change to me... :)
--Ned. On 8/1/17 9:32 AM, Markus Meskanen wrote: > I'd be more interested in supporting the "key" function: > > any(users, key=User.is_admin) > > As opposed to: > > any(user.is_admin() for user in users) > > 1.8.2017 16.07 "Louie Lu" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> kirjoitti: > > Hi all, > > In "min" and "max" builtin-func, it support two style of args: > > min(...) > min(iterable, *[, default=obj, key=func]) -> value > min(arg1, arg2, *args, *[, key=func]) -> value > > But for "any" and "all", it only support iterable: > > all(iterable, /) > Return True if bool(x) is True for all values x in the > iterable. > > > I'm not sure if this is discuss before, but can "any" and "all" > support like min_max "arg1, arg2, *args" style? > > > Thanks, > Louie. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas> > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > <http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
