Maybe ask core membership if they meant you to literally just post just the word "bump" to the list (my guess is not). Also the last time I see that you received any advice was a long time ago and regarding to a different issue. For this idea there's no issue and no patch (and core devs aren't required to read python-ideas).
Please understand that in this community you are expected to do some work yourself too -- we're not being paid to implement features proposed (or fix bugs reported) by users, we mostly implement/fix things we care about personally, and some of us sometimes volunteer to mentor users who show an interest in learning. IMO posting "bump" several times does not exhibit such interest. On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Bar Harel <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess so. > > Sorry for that. > To be honest I'm not entirely sure of the entire procedure and if small > things need a PEP or not. I actually received the tip to bump from > core-mentorship, so now I'm rather confused. > > Anyway, shall I add it to the bug tracker as an enhancement? > > On Sun, May 14, 2017, 7:26 PM Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> PS: I didn't see a message from Lisa on the mailing list -- maybe she >> replied to you only? >> >> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> How exactly do you think the process of adopting something into the >>> stdlib works? Just posting "bump" messages to the mailing list doesn't >>> really help, it just sounds rude.If you need help understanding how to >>> add/improve a stdlib module, please ask a specific about that topic. >>> >>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Bar Harel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Bump >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 4, 2017, 8:01 PM Lisa Roach <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 to this as well, I think this would be really useful in the stdlib. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Bar Harel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Any updates with a singledispatch for methods? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, 5:49 PM Bar Harel <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> At last! Haven't used single dispatch exactly because of that. Thank >>>>>>> you savior! >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016, 6:03 AM Tim Mitchell < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We have a modified version of singledispatch at work which works >>>>>>>> for methods as well as functions. We have open-sourced it as >>>>>>>> methoddispatch (pypi: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/methoddispatch). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> IMHO I thought it would make a nice addition to python stdlib. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What does everyone else think? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Python-ideas mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >>>>>>>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Python-ideas mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >>>>>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Python-ideas mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >>>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >> > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
