On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 2:16 PM, אלעזר <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like the idea, but I wanted to note that since it has no meaning from
> the point of view of the defined function, it can be done with a magic
> decorator, so new syntax is not required:
>
> @positional_only[:4]
> def replace(self, old, new, count=-1):
> ...
>
I"m confused, what does the [:4] mean?
if you want old and new to be positional only, wouldn't it be something
like:
@positional_only(3)
def replace(self, old, new, count=-1):
...
i.e. the first three parameters are positional only.
and why indexing/slice syntax???
+! on the idea -- still on the fence about syntax.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
