"Heiko Wundram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> As I've noticed that I find myself typing the latter quite often
> in code I write, it would only be sensible to add the corresponding
> syntax for the for statement:
>
> for node in tree if node.haschildren():
> <do something with node>
>
> as syntactic sugar for:
>
> for node in tree:
> if not node.haschildren():
> continue
> <do something with node>
Isn't this the same as
for node in tree:
if node.haschildren():
<do something with node>
so that all you would save is ':\n' and the extra indents?
tjr
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
