STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: RFC 5987 (Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters), August 2010: http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc5987.html#language.specification.in.encoded.words
<< 3.3 Language Specification in Encoded Words Section 5 of [RFC2231] extends the encoding defined in [RFC2047] to also support language specification in encoded words. Although the HTTP/1.1 specification does refer to RFC 2047 ([RFC2616], Section 2.2), it's not clear to which header field exactly it applies, and whether it is implemented in practice (see <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/111> for details). Thus, this specification does not include this feature. >> Hum ok, Latin1 looks safe and enough. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10980> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com