STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment:

RFC 5987 (Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol 
(HTTP) Header Field Parameters), August 2010:
http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc5987.html#language.specification.in.encoded.words

<< 3.3 Language Specification in Encoded Words

Section 5 of [RFC2231] extends the encoding defined in [RFC2047] to also 
support language specification in encoded words. Although the HTTP/1.1 
specification does refer to RFC 2047 ([RFC2616], Section 2.2), it's not clear 
to which header field exactly it applies, and whether it is implemented in 
practice (see <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/111> for details).

Thus, this specification does not include this feature. >>

Hum ok, Latin1 looks safe and enough.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10980>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to