Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Graham - the cases you describe are the things I was saying don't > currently work in my post and wouldn't be helped by Antoine's patch. > Your thoughts on how we could possibly make it work actually parallel > mine (although there may be fun and games with making sure the > respective GILs are acquired and released in an appropriate order when > switching interpreters).
There is only a single GIL, not one per interpreter. And this mustn't change since some objects are shared and their reference counts shouldn't be touched concurrently. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10915> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
