Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, anatoly techtonik <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > To summarize: What is wrong with my previous proposal if we remove t > from params? Not much is wrong with it. If it would come in a form of a patch and without typos or mark-up mistakes, I or another committer would probably apply it as an incremental improvement. However, given that additional effort is needed to apply your suggestion, I would rather wait until a better solution is available. Specifically, I don like the duplication of time.localtime().tm_isdst recipe in daylight and altzone. Also, these variables should really be grouped together in the docs. I would like this to be done before a committer spends time proofreading, fixing reST markup and committing the change. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7229> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
