Phillip J. Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> added the comment: You say it "would" do this. Have you actually *tested* it?
Looking at the code in wsgiref again, I don't think it does what you think it does. The '_' substitution is done to keyword arguments for header *parameters* only; it's not done to header *names*. Please write a test case for wsgiref.headers.Headers that demonstrates the behavior you think it would be doing. AFAICT, you will not even be able to get the replace() calls to execute without writing explicit add_header() calls, and even then, you *still* won't get the results you're describing. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10751> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
