Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> added the comment:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Georg Brandl <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > (What I mean is that overwriting \n or not, the code is unsafe, so the check > must be > done beforehand. Why should that be left to 3.3?) Reading beyond a buffer is somewhat safer than writing, but I agree that checks must be done before calling asctime/ctime. I thought it would have to wait because it is a feature. Some Linux users may expect year 10000 to work. (Maybe as a sentinel value somewhere.) But you are the RM, so it is your call. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8013> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
