Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> added the comment:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Alexander Belopolsky <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. >> Well, then I would have no problem with checking for that condition >> beforehand and raising >> ValueError. >> > > IIRC, there was a similar bug report about ctime where pre-condition > checking was required because platform ctime would crash for huge > values of time. I'll try to find the ticket. Hmm. My search brought up issue 10563, but the last message on that issue says that "a change has been recently made to time.asctime() to reject year > 9999. See r85137 and issue6608." I wonder if that change made this issue moot. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8013> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
