Senthil Kumaran <orsent...@gmail.com> added the comment: In the morning, I had a comment on the patch wondering why read _MAXLENGH + 1 and then check for len of header > _MAXLENGH. Instead of just reading _MAXLENGH (and if the length matched rejecting). ( Looks like it did not go through).
I think that either way is okay. I am taking the privilege of committing the patch. Fixed for py3k in 87373. So it is be available in the next beta. Shall merge the changes to other codelines. ---------- resolution: -> fixed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6791> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
