Steve Moran <s...@uw.edu> added the comment: Yeah, it's not immediately clear how to bring this up at
http://bugs.python.org/issue2636 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: > > Regex 0.1.20101210 is not part of the standard Python distribution, so this > bug report is invalid. See issue2636 for the development status of regex. > > ---------- > nosy: +belopolsky > resolution: -> invalid > status: open -> closed > superseder: -> Regexp 2.7 (modifications to current re 2.2.2) > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue10704> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10704> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com