Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Le samedi 27 novembre 2010 à 22:23 +0000, SilentGhost a écrit : > SilentGhost <michael.mischurow+...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > I thought PEP 3003 was quite unambiguous:
The stated goal of the moratorium is to make it easier for alternate implementations to catch up with the current language specification. Bringing back callable() doesn't go against this goal since they already have implemented it for 2.x. (not to mention that the implementation should be very simple) I wouldn't claim this is a authoritative interpretation but, if Guido doesn't oppose, I would take it for valid :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10518> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
