Daniel Stutzbach <stutzb...@google.com> added the comment: Antoine,
My original patch was much more focused, but had a slightly larger performance penalty for sorting random keys (see http://bugs.python.org/msg122178). Do you think the performance tradeoff there was still worthwhile? Ihave uploaded my original patch (as one patch :) ) here: http://codereview.appspot.com/3291041 If you think the original performance looks like a worthwhile tradeoff, could you spend about 1 minute looking over that version of patch and give your general impression? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9915> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
