Jeremy Thurgood <fir...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 17:11, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
>>I can't see any situation in which redirecting >> "/something?foo" to "/something?foo/" is the correct behaviour. > As I explained, in the previous post, this would *not happen* in > practical scenarios, because code won't reach that point for valid > URLs. It reaches that point in the tests I added, and the results confirm the first two points in the original bug report. Am I mistaken? "/something?foo" is a valid URL. If "/something" is translated to a file on the filesystem, the content of that file is returned. If it is translated to a directory on the filesystem, a 301 to "/something?foo/" is returned. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10231> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
