Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> Looks like a reasonable proposal, but coding this in C is a chore. It's not that bad. Most C code is a bit of a chore compared to Python but it really doesn't take much to write a C equivalent of: "functools.partial(%r, %s)" % (self.func, ', '.join(repr(a) for a in self.args) > How hard/inefficient would it be to have 99% of partial > coded in C and one stub in functools.py? Let's not do this. There is too little benefit to warrant going down the path of splitting the code across two langauges. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue4113> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
