Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Case Van Horsen <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > Has the cdecimal branch kept up with the hash value changes in 3.2?
Not sure; that's a question for Stefan. > Is there a still a chance that cdecimal could be merged into 3.2? A chance, yes; the major need is for someone with time to do a full review. (I'm afraid that's not me, right now.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7652> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
