Bruce Sherwood <bruce.sherw...@gmail.com> added the comment: Now I understand what you're getting at; I didn't realize that you were aiming at the possible distinction between 3 and 3.1. Yes, this is what bothered me and prompted my original posting. Python 3.1 goes into the same framework as the 2.x versions.
Incidentally, I did find that in /usr/local/bin (where I had not thought to look) there are the following: python3.1, a link to the framework python3.1 pythonw3.1, a link to the framework pythonw3.1 python3, a link to a framework python3, which is an extra copy (not a link) to the framework python3.1 pythonw3, a link to a framework pythonw3, which is a link to the framework python3.1 This looks to me pretty contorted, although I suppose the goal was to let people either run "python" (their most recent Python 2.x) or run "python3" (their most recent Python 3.x). A somewhat related example of confusion is that on Ubuntu 10.10 there is a shadowy existence for some python3 that has its own lib folder, in parallel to python3.1; the python3 doesn't seem to be simply an alias for python3.1. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10215> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
