Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I spent some time thinking of a name. I tried wait_predicate and > predicate_wait, but wait_for seemed natural. Any other ideas? > How about wait_until_true?
wait_for is ok IMO. > My original method had this as a free function, but I moved it into > the Condition because I could see no other kind of primitive that > would use it. I agree that it is unfortunate to pull what is > essentially a utility function into the Condition variable, so I am > leaning towards keeping it a module function. I'm not sure I see the point. It's an operation on a Condition variable, so it's natural to have it as a Condition method. A module function would feel rather weird. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10260> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
