R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:

Oddly, the test suite skips getoutput and getstatusoutput on windows with the 
comment that the source says it is relevant only for posix, but the 
documentation does not have 'availability: unix' tags.  (It is also odd that 
getoutput isn't documented, but that's a different issue.)

Your workaround can't be used as a fix, since the semantics of {}s in the shell 
are different from those of ()s.

It's not clear to me what the point of the {}s is, but I have a fear that 
eliminating them would introduce subtle changes in the behavior of getoutput 
calls.  Perhaps not, though.

It looks like this issue amounts to an RFE for support of 
getoutput/getstatusoutput on Windows, though the fact that it is not documented 
as unix-only may make it a bug instead :)

The appropriate fix is probably to conditionalize the code based on platform.  
A complete patch will require unit test changes and documentation changes 
(since the docs currently mention the braces).

All of that said, it also appears that the new check_output should be preferred 
to either getoutput or getstatusoutput.  Perhaps those functions could be 
re-implemented in terms of check_output.

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10197>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to