Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > I can't say anything about the standard, but p > q looks like it should > be the same as (p - q) > 0
Yep. > which looks rather well-defined for pointers. Nope. It's only well-defined for pointers pointing into the same array (or to one past the end of an array). Otherwise it's undefined behaviour. See section 6.5.6, paragraph 9, of http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10044> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
