Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> added the comment:
> Since the patch is intended to speed up 3.2 and your posted > experiments were run on that, I am puzzled that you would post a > test script to run under late 2.x instead of 3.1+. I had originally written the test script was originally written for something else and repurposed it. Actually, it's been repurposed at least twice so it has a long history and an unfortunate amount of cruft. I will work on porting it to run on py3k. My original examples did not use random data because timeit is challenging to use to time sorting of random data and I wanted to post something relatively concise. Sometime next week I plan to post extensive timing results on random data. I have been working on some fine-tuning of my patch as well as to my timing script. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9915> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
