Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:

I am following the suggestion in the last sentence of the original post and 
turning this into a doc issue. I believe it is standard that command-line 
switches override environmental variables when there is a conflict, but 'Using 
Python', section 1.2. 'Environment variables' could gain a sentence that says 
so, or whatever the case is. If I am correct, "These environment variables 
influence Python’s behavior." could be followed by "They are processed *before* 
the command-line switches other than -E."

As I read the doc, PYTHONOPTIMIZE = 0, does not seem to mean to the interpreter 
what you expect it to. "PYTHONOPTIMIZE  If this is set to a non-empty string it 
is equivalent to specifying the -O option. If set to an integer, it is 
equivalent to specifying -O multiple times." (which is to say, equivalent to 
-OO.) But the doc could be misleading. You can check the source if you wish.

In general there are lots of switches to alter defaults and turn things on but 
none to restore defaults and turn things off. The one exception is "-E  Ignore 
all PYTHON* environment variables, e.g. PYTHONPATH and PYTHONHOME, that might 
be set." The obvious intent is to start fresh and only specify what one wants. 
I do not think one idiosyncratic wrapper is sufficient reason to add one or 
more other off switches. There are already about 20 options. If you do not want 
something turned on, do not turn it on.

----------
stage:  -> needs patch

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9583>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to