Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
One other thought. If there is a perceived need, I would rather an alternate approach that unifies a language a bit by letting range() expose its arguments as a slice and modify its input to accept a slice. >>> range(0, 20, 2).slice slice(0, 20, 20) >>> range(_) range(0, 20, 2) >>> s = range(0, 20, 2).slice >>> s.start 0 >>> s.stop 20 >>> s.step 2 ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9896> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
