Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Well, the core issue is a disagreement on the way to go.
I would agree with Benjamin's and Christian's proposal, given that it's quite practical to implement. Guido's proposal means we would have to add new modules just so that the relevant C types can be exposed "at the right place". The types module is generally used for low-level trickery (since most useful types are accessible from the builtin namespace), and IMO it makes sense to have a dedicated module for that. ---------- nosy: +pitrou _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1605> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
