New submission from Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr>:
They both return raw tuples, which are not very intuitive to interpret:
>>> email.utils.parsedate_tz("Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT)")
(2010, 9, 15, 9, 53, 50, 0, 1, -1, -25200)
It would be much better if they returned some kind of namedtuple, which would
preserve backwards compatibility but with much better readability and usability.
Note that parsedate() could also return the existing time.struct_time type
(which is compatible with a 9-tuple):
http://docs.python.org/library/time.html#time.struct_time
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 116473
nosy: barry, pitrou, r.david.murray
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: email.utils.{parsedate,parsedate_tz} should have better return types
type: feature request
versions: Python 3.2
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9864>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
