Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: Nice, thank you. I will look at the patch and commit it if everything's fine.
> A nicer solution is to simply make socket.socket actually be a simple > subclass of _socket.socket rather than the weird decorator it is now. > This has already happened on the py3k branch, which is why it doesn't > have this bug. Yes, but such a rearchitecting to the socket module is out of question for 2.x, which is in bugfix mode. ---------- assignee: -> pitrou stage: needs patch -> commit review _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9729> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
