Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment:
> cc_r does not seems to be able to compile py3k, so it seems to be a bad
> idea to force it by default.
Python should be able to compile with any C89-compliant compiler, so it seems a
good idea to open a bug for compile errors instead.
In this case, the fix is trivial, though, so I'm simply committing it (replace
a C++-style comment ("// ...") with a normal "/* ... */")). Can you try again
with r84799?
That said, it seems xlc (or xlc_r) enables additional C extensions compared to
cc, so perhaps it's beneficial to use it anyway?
----------
nosy: +pitrou
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1633863>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
