Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Eli, while porting your tests to py3k, I had to change expected output for list comprehension testing. This is not really surprising because 3.x comprehensions differ from 2.x (they don't leak the loop variable anymore). The difference between versions is most pronounced if a comprehension is spread in several lines: l = [i for i in range(10)] The coverage of the above code in 2.x is 1: l = [i for i in 11: range(10)] but in 3.x, I get 12: l = [i for 10: i in 1: range(10)] Not surprisingly, 3.x coverage output for generators is the same as for comprehensions: 12: l = list(i for 10: i in 1: range(10)) but in 2.x, 12: l = list(i for i in 1: range(10)) In any case, I think the counts from the second and third line (10 and 1) are probably correct in 3.x, but I cannot explain 12 in the first line. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9315> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com