Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: Being able to write a global option after a command name seems a nice feature to me, and the implementation should be straightforward: The base Command class already adds some options like help to each subclass, it’s just a matter of adding verbose, quiet and dry-run and adapting distribution.
no-user-cfg would have to be special-cased: Giving this option to one command would just pass it to the Distribution instance. Supporting per-command no-user-cfg would be overly complicated and not really useful. ---------- components: +Distutils2 -Distutils versions: +Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1109659> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
