Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment: Daniel Stutzbach wrote: > > Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> added the comment: > > Thanks. I dug into that a little just now, and it turns out to happen > automatically. > > If ./configure doesn't define HAVE_WCHAR_H then it also will not define > SIZEOF_WCHAR_T. If SIZEOF_WCHAR_T is not defined, the preprocessor will > treat it as 0 causing it to be unequal to Py_UNICODE_SIZE. In other words, > if HAVE_WCHAR_H is not defined then SIZEOF_WCHAR_T == Py_UNICODE_SIZE will be > false.
Ok, thanks for checking. Other than that detail, I think the patch looks good. ---------- title: 32-bit wchar_t doesn't need to be unsigned to be usable (I think) -> 32-bit wchar_t doesn't need to be unsigned to be usable (I think) _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8781> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
