Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I'm not sure whether backporting it to 3.1 is a good idea. It's > potentially an ABI change (although a minor one, as the field offsets > remain the same, only the interpretation of the padding may change).
Well, it is unlikely that anyone is accessing setentry structures directly, given that no API function returns one, and the hash collision resolution algorithm is not provided. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9612> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
