Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> FWIW, I agree with Antoine. You cannot know in advance whether a > partial-subclass has semantics that need to be preserved when > flattening. Raymond, I have actually conceded this point to Antoine. See msg108980 above. Not only the latest patch preserves partial-subclasses, it also foregoes the optimization if there is anything in __dict__ of the inner partial. It looks like we have a consensus on the features, the remaining question is whether this is enough of an optimization to justify adding extra code. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7830> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
