Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdr...@acm.org> added the comment: I disagree.
The documentation should promote RawConfigParser, and note SafeConfigParser and ConfigParser as remaining for backward compatibility for existing software. Maintainers of legacy software using ConfigParser should be encouraged to convert to SafeConfigParser (or even RawConfigParser) if possible. Documentation changes should be sufficient; deprecation warnings typically generate more pain than good. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6517> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
