Ask Solem <a...@opera.com> added the comment: Jesse wrote,
> We can work around the shutdown issue (really, bug 9207) by > ignoring the exception such as shutdown.patch does, or passing in > references/adding references to the functions those methods need. Or (as > Brett suggested) converting them to class methods and adding references to > the class. Or passing them in via the signature like this > _handle_workers(arg, _debug=debug), etc. Greg wrote, > Another option would be to enable only for the worker handler. I > don't have a particularly great sense of what the Right Thing to > do here is. I don't think _make_shutdown_safe should be added to the result handler. If the error can indeed happen there, then we need to solve it in a way that enables it to finish the work. Jesse, how hard is it to fix the worker handler by passing the references? Note that _worker_handler is not important to complete shutdown at this point, but it may be in the future (it seems termination.patch already changes this) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9205> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
