Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: I've committed the fix in r82885 (3.2) and r82886 (3.1). The reliance on random still looks a bit quirky to me, but at least the test now does what it should do, and has a cleaned up coding style.
I'm leaving this issue open, for the other test might be interesting to integrate as well. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9251> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
