Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
> I also don't think that the 2.x-to-3.x maintenance issue > is that big a deal any more; it would be surprising if > the 2.x version of Decimal sees anything more than minor > changes (doc fixes, etc.) from this point on. So perhaps > the 3.x version of the decimal module should be free to > make full use of 3.x syntax? I would like to still leave us at 2.5 compatible. The internal comments promise that spec updates will be treated as bug fixes. This is all the more likely if 2.7 is the last, but long lived version in the 2.x series. Besides, I don't think the set comprehension notation was a big win in readability over what is there now :-) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9136> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
