David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> added the comment: Thank you Mark for confirming what I found.
I understand your reservations about the code if you don't know of its correctness. I must admit I don't myself. I don't have a clue how this _socket module should be built. But it is clear to me that the original code is attempting to compile code using PACKET_LOOPBACK, PACKET_FASTROUTE and SIOCGIFNAME, despite they are not defined. Although I'm not a mind-reader, I believer the original programmer probably thought they were defined in the header file netpacket/packet.h, when in fact they are not on Solaris. I wish I could take Martin v. Löwis up on his "5-for-one deal", where I review 5 issues and he deals with this one. Unfortunately, I'm very new to python, so really are not going to be a lot of help to anyone in reviewing issues. I will just have to keep that patch in Sage until it either gets to the top of Martin's TODO list, or someone else deals with it. Dave ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8852> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
