Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> added the comment:

> It would be great if you could shed
> some light on the history behind pure
> python implementation.  Why was it
> developed in the first place?

It was rapid prototyping - design decisions were changing daily, and it goes a 
lot faster to change Python code than C code.

> What was the reason not to ship it
> with python?

Didn't want to create new ongoing maintenance burdens.  Multiple 
implementations eventually drift out of synch, and at the time we had had 
enough of that already wrt, e.g., pickle vs cPickle.

Sorry, nothing deep here ;-)

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7989>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to