Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I checked every usage of Py_IS* in the tree and this is an isolated > case. So I think it's better to do the check explicitly and add a > comment to the Py_IS* macros. > > > Does the patch look good?
Nice. I suppose Py_CHARMASK still needs fixing for the general case, though). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9020> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
